#Nioh pc ultrawide 1080p
#Nioh pc ultrawide full size

#Nioh pc ultrawide full size

This is the same horizontal resolution as the consumer UHD standard, which means that 4K movies in a 21:9 or similar aspect ratio will be viewable in their full size with a 1:1 pixel ratio. I was so focused on regaining that missing vertical resolution that I initially failed to appreciate the jump in horizontal resolution from 3440px to 3840px. There's also an unexpected benefit for video content that I hadn't originally considered. And with its 38-inch size, the display is quite usable at 100 percent scaling. The height of the display area felt great for tasks like video editing in Premiere and referencing multiple side-by-side documents and websites, and the gaming experience was just as satisfying.

It shares the same glorious 3840×1600 resolution as others in its class, but it also offers some unique features, including a 75Hz refresh rate, USB-C input, and AMD FreeSync support.īased on my time with the XR382CQK, my hopes for those extra 160 of resolution were fulfilled. I've had the opportunity to test one of these new 'taller' displays thanks to a review loan from Acer of the XR382CQK, a curved 37.5-inch behemoth.

#Nioh pc ultrawide 1080p

Just like the how the early ultrawides 'stretched' a 1080p or 1440p monitor, the 38-inch versions do the same for my beloved 2560×1600 displays. In the second half of 2017, display manufactures such as Dell, Acer, and LG launched 38-inch ultrawide monitors with a 3840×1600 resolution.

Thankfully, a new breed of ultrawide monitors is here to save the day. The ultrawide form factor is fantastic for movies and games, but while some find them perfectly acceptable for productivity, I still felt cramped. While this gives users extra resolution on the sides, it maintains the same limited height options of those ubiquitous 1080p and 1440p displays. Most ultrawides feature a 21:9 aspect ratio with resolutions of 2560×1080 or 3440×1440. I was therefore sad to see that the relatively new ultrawide monitor market continued the trend of limited vertical resolutions. Those seemingly insignificant pixels turned out to make a noticeable difference in terms of on-screen productivity real estate, and my 1080p and 1440p displays have always felt cramped as a result. I was well-accustomed to my 16:10 monitors when the 16:9 aspect ratio took over the market, and while I initially thought that the 120 or 160 missing rows of pixels wouldn't be missed, I was unfortunately mistaken. This led to the introduction of PC displays with native resolutions of 1920×10×1440, keeping things simple for activities such as media playback but robbing consumers of pixels in terms of vertical resolution. I grew to rely on and appreciate the extra vertical resolution that 16:10 displays offer, but as the production and development of 'widescreen' PC monitors matured, it naturally began to merge with the television industry, which had long since settled on a 16:9 aspect ratio. My first widescreen displays were a pair of Dell monitors with a 1920×1200 resolution and, as time and technology marched forward, I moved to larger 2560×1600 monitors. When PC monitors made the mainstream transition to widescreen aspect ratios in the mid-2000s, many manufacturers opted for resolutions at a 16:10 ratio.

We want that sweet sweet vertical resolution!ģ840×1600 Ultrawide Monitors: How 160 Lines Can Make All the Difference We want that sweet sweet vertical resolution!.

3840×1600 Ultrawide Monitors: How 160 Lines Can Make All the Difference.